Skip to content
In preview with selected California firms

The matter intelligence platform for HOA litigation.

Tract reads the full record, verifies every citation, and keeps the matter current as evidence arrives. Built for California Davis-Stirling work.

Built for the attorney who inherits the file. In private preview with a small cohort of California firms. Access reviewed case by case.

Matters

4 active
Need attention
2
Running
1
Reports ready
2
Awaiting docs
0
Active (4)
Archived
Residents v. Canyon Ridge Master Association
Complete
29 findings · 8 critical · 13 significant
321 docsanalyzed 2h ago
Whitfield v. Seabluff Association
Analyzing
Analysis in progress · 412 documents
412 docsstarted 14m ago
Torres v. Oak Valley HOA
Complete
12 findings · 3 critical · 7 significant
147 docsanalyzed 3d ago
Linden Cove HOA · rule amendment review
Complete
4 findings · 2 significant · 2 moderate
58 docsanalyzed 1w ago
01

Multi-matter workspace

Every active matter, sorted by what needs attention. Severity visible at a glance.

02

Findings with verified citations

Statutes cited verbatim. Adverse facts surfaced. Every claim traced to a page.

03

Living case chronology

Every dated event plotted in time. New evidence marked. Findings linked.

04

Demand letter drafting

Select findings. Configure the letter. Export to Word.


The advantage

Command of the record is the advantage.

Document-heavy HOA matters reward the attorney who knows the record cold. Tract makes that position scale across every matter on your desk.

The traditional workup

  • Associate reads the full record, at the hourly rates that bookWeeks of time billed against a matter that may not justify them.
  • Citations checked manually against the Civil CodeOr left unverified and hoped for the best.
  • Case chronology assembled in a spreadsheetRebuilt from scratch when new evidence arrives.
  • Demand letter drafted from a prior templateStatute text re-pasted, re-formatted, re-proofed.
  • Document-heavy matters declined on marginThe review cost exceeded the case value.

With Tract in the workspace

  • The full record read on every matter, on the first dayEvery attachment, every footnote, every amendment.
  • Every citation checked against the verified Davis-Stirling corpusMismatches flagged before they reach the attorney.
  • Chronology generated from the findings, updated as evidence arrivesNew and updated events marked on re-analysis.
  • Demand letter drafted from selected findings, citations verbatimAddressee, demands, deadline configured. Export to Word.
  • Document-heavy matters become the profitable onesThe economics of thin-margin work reconsidered.
Every section
of the Act
The Davis-Stirling Act loaded and indexed. Citations matched against the corpus, not summarized from it.
Every page,
every matter
No sampling. No skipped attachments. The record read in full on every analysis.
Every finding,
anchored
No invented facts. Every claim traces to a specific document and page in your record.

01 · The matter workspace

Every matter on your desk, in one workspace.

Tract sorts your active work by what needs attention. Failed analyses rise. Live runs show in real time. Completed work rests below, ready when you need it.

What it does

  • Priority-sorted.Matters needing attention rise. Completed work rests below.
  • Live status.Running analyses show a timestamp. Completed reports show severity rollups.
  • Severity rails.Red for critical, amber for significant. Triage in three seconds.
  • Search and sort.By name, association, priority, recent.
  • Active and archived.Closed matters off the main view. Restore anytime.

Matters

4 active
Need attention
2
Running
1
Reports ready
2
Awaiting docs
0
Active (4)
Archived
Residents v. Canyon Ridge Master Association
Complete
29 findings · 8 critical · 13 significant
321 docsanalyzed 2h ago
Whitfield v. Seabluff Association
Analyzing
Analysis in progress · 412 documents
412 docsstarted 14m ago
Torres v. Oak Valley HOA
Complete
12 findings · 3 critical · 7 significant
147 docsanalyzed 3d ago
Linden Cove HOA · rule amendment review
Complete
4 findings · 2 significant · 2 moderate
58 docsanalyzed 1w ago
02 · Findings with citations

Every finding shows its work.

Statute cited word for word. Supporting excerpts anchored to the page. Adverse facts alongside support. Nothing approximated.

What it does

  • Verified statute citations.Checked against the Davis-Stirling corpus. A green dot means exact match.
  • Anchored excerpts.Direct quotes with document name and page. Trace to source in one click.
  • Adverse facts in the finding itself.Equal weight to the supporting evidence. No surprises in mediation.
  • Support level in plain legal language.Established, supported, probable, needs corroboration.
  • One click into the demand letter.Selected findings flow into the drafting view.
All matters / Canyon Ridge Master Association / Finding
Critical · Finding 1 of 29

Complainant identity disclosed to the subject of the complaint.

A confrontation followed in the presence of a minor child. No authorization for the disclosure appears in the record.

Support
Probable
Citations
§5230(c) · §4515 · §3294
Sources
7 excerpts · 3 docs
What the record supports 2 excerpts
“We apologize for the uncomfortable situation you experienced on the evening of December 22, in the vicinity of the common area.”
Management apology email · page 16
What weakens this 1 fact
“The Association has not determined who communicated the complaint, or whether Board authorization preceded that communication.”
Same email, continued · page 19
Statute cited Verified against corpus
Civil Code §5230(c)Verified
“A member's identity shall not be disclosed to any third party in connection with a complaint or inquiry to the association or its agents without the prior written consent of the member, except as required by law or by the express authorization of the board recorded in minutes.”
03 · Case chronology

The case, in order.

Every dated event from the findings plotted on a timeline. New evidence marked. Each entry linked to the finding it came from.

Chronology

↓ Download
14 events extracted from 29 findings
Dec 10, 2025Complaint

Initial compliance complaint submitted by members regarding unauthorized vendor operations on common area.

Finding #1
Dec 17, 2025Administrative

Management acknowledged complaint in internal email. No Board authorization for disclosure recorded in minutes.

Finding #1
Dec 22, 2025Violation

Confrontation in common area between vendor and complaining members, in presence of minor child.

Finding #1
Jan 08, 2026ResponseUpdated

Board open session confirmed no written policy governs compliance complaint handling.

Finding #4
Feb 14, 2026RequestNew

First of three records requests under Civil Code §5210 submitted to Association.

Finding #7
Mar 01, 2026DeadlineNew

Records request deadline lapsed. Partial production provided seven days late.

Finding #7

What it does

  • Auto-generated from findings.Every dated event becomes a timeline node. No manual entry.
  • Categorized by event type.Violation. Response. Disclosure. Request. Deadline. Administrative.
  • Marked on re-analysis.New and updated events flagged when new evidence arrives.
  • Linked to source finding.Jump from timeline to finding without leaving the matter.
  • Exportable.For discovery, mediation briefs, or client memos.
04 · Demand letter drafting

Select findings. Draft the demand.

Pick the findings. Pick the addressee. Set the deadline. Tract drafts the demand letter with statute text verbatim. Export to Word.

What it does

  • Structured around real remedies.Produce records. Cease activity. Reverse amendments. Provide accounting.
  • Addressee-appropriate voice.Board President. Management Company. Association Counsel.
  • Your choice of deadline.Ten, fifteen, or thirty days. Date calculated automatically.
  • Every citation verbatim.Statute text from the verified corpus. No paraphrased law.
  • Export to Word.Formatted .docx with proper headings and page numbers.

Draft demand letter

Configure
Based on 5 selected findings
Critical#1 Identity disclosed to subject of complaint
Critical#2 Vendor operated without executed contract
Critical#3 Three records requests ignored or delayed
Significant#5 Board directive non-implementation
Significant#6 Non-resident access policy violation
Addressed to
Board President
Management Company
Association Counsel
Other
Demands
Produce records
§5235
Terminate non-compliant vendor
Provide financial accounting
§5500
Reverse unauthorized rule amendment
§4360
Response deadline
10 days
15 days
30 days
Before you ask

The questions that matter.

What stops it from inventing a citation?
Every statute citation is checked against the verified corpus before the finding reaches you. Citations that do not match are flagged, not hidden. You see which are exact, which are paraphrased, and which need a second look.
Does Tract give legal advice or strategy?
No. Tract extracts, organizes, cites, and drafts. Every judgment call remains with the attorney. The findings surface what the record shows. What to do about it is your work. That is where Tract stops and you begin.
Can I defend this to my carrier?
Tract keeps an auditable log of every upload, every analysis, every export, and every finding you included in a demand letter. The trail is structured for carrier review.
Will my record be used to train a model?
No. Tract runs under a zero retention agreement with its AI provider. The record is processed, the report is produced, the inputs are dropped. No shared embeddings across matters.

Confidentiality

Your files stay yours. Privilege is the default.

Every matter is isolated. One attorney's file cannot be read by another. No cross-matter embeddings. No shared search.

No content is retained after analysis. The model receives the record, produces the report, and drops the inputs.

Every action is logged. Every upload, analysis, export, and login. An auditable trail on every matter.

Privilege aware by default. Findings, excerpts, and drafts never leave your matter. Sharing is explicit, not inferred.

Technical detail
  • Encryption at restAES-256 · AWS KMS
  • Encryption in transitTLS 1.3
  • AuthenticationClerk · SOC 2 Type II
  • PaymentsStripe · PCI-DSS Level 1
  • AI providerZero retention agreement
  • Audit log retentionImmutable · 7 years
Early access

Tract is in private preview with selected California firms.

A small cohort of founding attorneys is using Tract on active matters through the preview period. We review each request individually and onboard hands-on.

Who we're onboarding
California attorneys handling Davis-Stirling matters. Solo, small firm, and select plaintiff-side practices.
What preview includes
A private demo on one of your matters. Hands-on onboarding. Direct access to the team shaping the product.
How we review
We review each request against our current cohort. A reply within two business days, whether we open access or not.

Introductions welcome. Not every request becomes access.

Every HOA matter you run lives somewhere. Today it lives in folders, binders, and whoever touched it last. Tract is where it lives now.

The record, the citations, the chronology, the demand. One workspace, built for the life of the matter.

Tract · The matter intelligence platform for HOA litigation.
Tract — The matter intelligence platform for HOA litigation